The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Friday, June 28, 2024, by a 6-3 decision, rejected the Chevron deference that developed out of 1984 decision in Chevron v. the Natural Resources Defense Council. The Chevron doctrine that had been in place for forty years meant that if Congress had not directly addressed a question at the center of a dispute, courts were required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it reasonable.
Last month’s 35-page SCOTUS ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, rejects that doctrine calling it “fundamentally misguided.” The ruling came in the Justices’ consideration of Relentless v. Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, where SCOTUS agreed to address only the Chevron questions in the appeals.
Chief Justice Roberts explained in his opinion that the Chevron deference in inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that sets out procedures that federal agencies must follow for courts to review actions by these agencies. Chief Roberts stated that “Congress expects courts to handle technical statutory questions.”
This decision could have far-reaching implications for federal water resource regulations, such as determination of jurisdiction under Water of the United States and other water-related regulations.
Congress and the federal agencies are currently reviewing the fallout of the decision and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) today introduced a bill in the Senate to reverse the impacts of the SCOTUS decision. In the House, the Committee on House Administration held a hearing today to look at the issues of “Congress in a Post-Chevron World.”